Saturday, June 25, 2011

eva longoria dresses 2010

images eva longoria dresses 2010. eva longoria dresses 2010. Get The Look: Eva Longoria#39;s
  • Get The Look: Eva Longoria#39;s



  • wahwah
    02-21 02:17 PM
    i disagree. EB2 India is not more crowded than EB3 India. EB2 India currently went U because DOS made a dumb mistake of releasing the EB2 PD to April 2004 back during the October 2007 VB. That is why the visas for EB2 got exhausted so quickly. The problem is that there are still lot of candidates from 2002 and 2003 that are unapproved so it didn't make sense to release the October VB with April 2004 PD.

    I doubt if in April 2008, the EB2 India PD would move to Dec.2003 as there are still alot of people waiting in 2002 and all of 2003.

    As per my lawer this is not a right time to port your date to EB2 as at this moment nobody knows anything and there are very least chance for eb2 to move forward.:cool: as per her now eb2 is more crowded than EB3 that's why it became UNavailable. It's just a suggestion keep yourself with same EB3 or EB2 whatever you have otherwise I know one frined he ported his July2001 to EB2 and at this time EB3 is current for this date although eb2 unavailable





    wallpaper Get The Look: Eva Longoria#39;s eva longoria dresses 2010. Eva Longoria, Ali Larter,
  • Eva Longoria, Ali Larter,



  • saimrathi
    07-03 04:18 PM
    When we are already doing the work (sending flowers, calling senators & media etc), why should we pay IV? Also, I would feel more comfy donating to something where I can see where the money is going.. I'm not well versed with the website, but is there a place I can get financial info from.. Thnks..

    I understand your concern, it could be a waste of time and might not get us relief, but look, we have been trying to raise awareness and get media attention. And this law-suit will definately get us attention and open up debate about legal-immigrants.
    Lawsuit against USCIS, generates a lot of media articles and also the wrong-doing will be highlighted and brought to the administration's attention.





    eva longoria dresses 2010. eva longoria dresses 2009.
  • eva longoria dresses 2009.



  • BharatPremi
    03-12 12:02 PM
    I am worried about this financial reports. I am not sure many consulting companies will give those to employee who is leaving

    Yes, I believe, most companies (new employers - mid level) would not even ask and if requested and you can not provide then generally they may not make a big deal but underlying result for asking is to check if financial strength is "Good" and I-140 is approved then no problem hiring an EAD holder.





    2011 Eva Longoria, Ali Larter, eva longoria dresses 2010. Eva Longoria and Dita Von
  • Eva Longoria and Dita Von



  • nixstor
    07-04 09:44 PM
    Please stop posting this on every thread. In one line you are just spamming. We all visit Attorney Oh's website often. He does not need any publicity

    immigration-law.com

    07/04/2007: Status and Issues Involving July 2007 485 Fiasco

    * The AILF work on the lawsuit appears to be in progress without any hurdles. It has reported that enough candidates have come forward to participate in the lawsuit as the plaintiffs and it does not need any more candidates to move forward for the lawsuit. Some of other people are likely to be covered as members of the class action regardless of their actual participation in the lawsuit. People should send "THANK YOU" to the AILF Legal Action Center leaders and the attorneys who are actually working on this case. Some contribution to the AILF may be more than appropriate. Please visit the AILF site to learn how they can send in contribution.

    #
    # We have been asked by the readers to report the alleged conspiracy theory. We declined to do it. However, people may want to know potential issues that should be answered and explored. We will discuss these issues on following hypotehtical premises:

    * Presumption of Facts: (1) The I-485 applications have been experiencing a tremendous backlog lately. (2) The causes for the backlog have been known to be delays in the security checks. Some of these applicants have sought a relief in federal courts in the form of mandamus actions. (3) Allegedly, the USCIS pull together local and Service Center employees and pull out pending I-485 cases which were older than six months in backlog, working overtime and during the weekend right before July 1, 2007. This is an assumption at this point. (4) As evidenced by the revised Visa Bulletin, apparently these employees contacted "en mass" the DOS to request the visa numbers for these pending I-485 cases, which the DOS reported in the release of the revised VB turned out exceeding 60,000. (5) The rule requires that the USCIS approves I-485 cases "prior to" to contacting and requesting a visa number. (6) The current USCIS policy and procedure also require that I-485 applications be adjudicated and approved "only after" the completion of clearance of the security checks.

    * Issue I: Hypothetically, what happens if the USCIS takes out the visa number before they obtain the security clearace?
    o Answer I: Obviously it would violate the rules and the laws.
    o Answer II: It will constitue a serious security lapse, compromising the homeland security.
    * Issue II: Hypothetically, what hppens if the USCIS requests and takes out the visa numbers prior to adjudication and approval of the pending I-485 applications?
    o Answer I: It is evident that the USCIS would violate the rules and the laws.
    o Answer II: There could be two probable consequences affecting the backlog I-485 applicants and the new July Visa Bulletin eligible I-485 applicants, shoud the hypothetical facts develop. (1) The backlog I-485 applicants who have been issued I-485 approval notices should not be affected by the fiasco, albeit the potential revocation of the I-485 approvals. In most cases, revocation of the approved I-485 requires the time-consuming immigration court proceedings, assuming that the USCIS has a sufficient cause of action which may be questionable in this case. (2) The backlog I-485 applicants who have yet to receive the approval notice and the USCIS has yet to adjudicate and approve the application might be vulnerable in that the USCIS might be required to return the visa numbers for these cases as there was an error. Hypothetically, these numbers could be returned to the State Department and based on these returned number, the State Department might be required to revise the July Visa Bulletin again.



    more...


    eva longoria dresses 2010. Eva Longoria Red Fishtail Gown
  • Eva Longoria Red Fishtail Gown



  • Mr.Z
    12-09 01:43 PM
    Hi friends,
    I need your help!!!

    I'm here at California with L-2 visa. I can stay legally in US but i can not get a SSN number, i can work too.But For a driver license they ask for SSN. Do i still get the Driver License or no?


    Thank you very much...





    eva longoria dresses 2010. eva longoria dresses 2011. eva
  • eva longoria dresses 2011. eva



  • gvenkat
    04-07 10:41 AM
    Rumor, rumor, and more rumors. We Indians get a kick out of this stuff, dont we? This actually happened with me couple of weeks ago.

    POE: San Francisco. I hold a completely different job compared to my Masters degree. I was asked what qualifications I have to hold a job in marketing when my background was technology. I gave an explanation and the VO looked up and smile. He said, you memorized your answers well. I said, I've been doing it for the last five years. He laughed and said, you guys are smart cookies. Have fun, summer is around. NEXT.

    Note to people who like to spread Bullshit: Please STOP spreading horsemanure. Unless your paperwork is completely out of whack, no VO at the POE has the RIGHT/AUTHORITY to send you back. I spoke to an immigration lawyer at a party couple of months ago. He said deportation procedures are not that simple. The VO has to call DHS and Immigration Services. Once they take over the case, it takes 12 to 24 hours to do a background check. Until that time, the person is held in custody at the Airport. A decent bed and food is provided. If the documents check out incorrect then authorities in the home country are informed and so is the Embassy in United States. DHS and USCIS allow folks from (Indian embassy) to interview the candidate (potential value target: crime recod back home, etc). If the embassy decides that the documents were forged then it will send a memo to the Indian Airport and ask the Indian police to book a case after the person arrives. The process is much detailed than making a call to somebody's father or father-in-law and asking, DO YOU NEED XYZ for this job.

    So all this is dino-dung. Stop wasting time at your desk and do something productive.

    Let the red-dots rain.

    Seriosly bro. U hit the nail on the head.. It's just rumor mongering at its best and we desis surely do get a kick out of it.. the guys who start these threads/rumors should be just , banned from the forums..

    Have u noticed? it's always a friend's friend or a colleagues friend or a friend's friend's wife. it's never a friend or themselves...

    The logic to send back does not hold good... If u have all ur papers there is NO WAY They can send u back.. if u had overstayed, be on bench and all other issues, yes u could have a possibility of being questioned.. if ur papers or on order.. it's just like a regular travel.



    more...


    eva longoria dresses 2010. Eva Longoria-Parker in a Jenny
  • Eva Longoria-Parker in a Jenny



  • pappu
    07-23 10:36 PM
    May be I asked you same question before.
    What is the best way to send to CIS when receipt notice is not received yet.
    When you said reject, what do you mean?
    Will CIS reject before issuing RN or after issuing RN?
    - Which receipt notice? 140?
    - I meant denial.
    - After issuing RN and later during adjucation process.





    2010 eva longoria dresses 2009. eva longoria dresses 2010. eva longoria dresses 2010.
  • eva longoria dresses 2010.



  • mirage
    02-04 10:50 AM
    For people who don't know, Country Cap goes by Country of Birth , not country of citizenship...So if you are born in India but now you are canadian Citizen, you will still be counted as Indian for EB based Green Card allocation, isn't this a blatent racist agenda. I have a letter from Congresswoman Zoe Logfren's office, which clearly says 'I will work on removing arbitrary country quota on employement based Green Cards', we just need to pursue her...



    more...


    eva longoria dresses 2010. Glitter embellished dress
  • Glitter embellished dress



  • webm
    06-06 02:16 PM
    Congrats!! bodhi_tree





    hair Eva Longoria and Dita Von eva longoria dresses 2010. Naeem Khan Spring Summer 2010
  • Naeem Khan Spring Summer 2010



  • yabadaba
    08-15 04:35 PM
    Please link it.
    read the bulletin!



    more...


    eva longoria dresses 2010. Eva brought the drama tonight
  • Eva brought the drama tonight



  • TexDBoy
    09-10 02:42 PM
    You can open real player ... then file -> open ..
    http://judiciary.edgeboss.net/real-live/judiciary/17223/56_judiciary-coj_2141_070212.smi





    hot Eva Longoria Red Fishtail Gown eva longoria dresses 2010. eva longoria dresses 2010.
  • eva longoria dresses 2010.



  • drirshad
    07-02 06:32 AM
    So far so good, hope we are on the same note rest of the week.



    more...


    house actress Eva Longoria wore eva longoria dresses 2010. eva longoria dresses 2010.
  • eva longoria dresses 2010.



  • tsnaresh
    03-18 10:17 AM
    Is there a group created for Ohio state? I have sent an email to "IV-Ohio@googlegroups.com" but email was not delivered (invalid group). Also, any one interested in car pooling from Cleveland, Ohio?
    Thank you





    tattoo eva longoria dresses 2011. eva eva longoria dresses 2010. Eva Longoria or Kim Kardashian
  • Eva Longoria or Kim Kardashian



  • go_gc_way
    01-18 02:05 PM
    Hi Go_Gc_Way

    Can you please modify the AD content.

    Immigration voice is a non-profit 501 (c) (4) (pending) organization. All of Immigration Voice�s financial transactions will be audited by a CPA, submitted to the IRS.(please remove pending,we are approved)

    Members from 6000 to 8000.

    Content, content updated. Please verify and let me know.



    more...


    pictures Eva Longoria-Parker in a Jenny eva longoria dresses 2010. on Eva Longoria Parker (it
  • on Eva Longoria Parker (it



  • aroranuj
    09-11 09:44 AM
    Just called the House judiciary committe and was told that there are no markups planned for today. Apparently they havent figured out when they would like to come back next for the mark ups.

    I believe instead of posting ideas for what we can do in the future we need to live in the present and not waste valuable time. We need to reenergize ourselves and spend any extra time that we have by making some calls...Please focus on this thread till the time there are no available updates...

    http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=21393





    dresses eva longoria dresses 2010. eva longoria dresses 2010. Eva Longoria#39;s Dress -- Regal
  • Eva Longoria#39;s Dress -- Regal



  • greenguru
    12-10 02:16 PM
    He got his GC.. i will not expect him here.. we need one more VLDrao



    more...


    makeup Glitter embellished dress eva longoria dresses 2010. actress Eva Longoria wore
  • actress Eva Longoria wore



  • breddy2000
    01-17 03:02 PM
    Started to contribute $20 monthly.
    Already contributed $200 earlier





    girlfriend Eva Longoria or Kim Kardashian eva longoria dresses 2010. eva longoria updo styles
  • eva longoria updo styles



  • abhijitp
    08-03 08:26 PM
    abhijitp,
    Thanks for the update and good to know that we will get an RFE and not a rejection for our EVL.
    But on (2), what if we already have an A# from our approved I-140? Is there any other way to know that our application has been accepted??
    Actually receiving the I-485 RN implies no rejection, only RFE, that is what the service representative told me about.





    hairstyles Eva brought the drama tonight eva longoria dresses 2010. Eva Longoria 1 Girl, 2 Outfits
  • Eva Longoria 1 Girl, 2 Outfits



  • pappu
    07-26 10:28 AM
    are they encouraging prinicipal aliens to "batter" spouses, so that they will be given permission to work:) Isn't spouses not able to work a pain by itself? Geez

    btw law states that domestic violence is a deportable offence. it is taken seriously by uscis. even convicted greencard holders are deported.





    chanduv23
    11-11 03:47 PM
    We can do something to start with call. later admin adds funding drive or some senior member will add funding drive. Why people asking for IV core is If I or other member will start some thread/campaign it will divert to other discussion or no more support. But I have notice that if IV core starts it people become active and call or write email.

    Even being a organization some one may be prez of IV org can call Zoe and find out what will be deal with HR 5882 in lame duck session. They will not reply to me or other members but atleast can reply to some IV rep.

    hows that ? I am not favoring rajuram or not against chandu.. just expressing what I am thinking and what others may do..

    You are also a very active poster and can definitely help IV in all possible ways. Thanks for all the help.





    vin13
    02-11 06:48 PM
    There is a huge backlog in FB category. How come there are 13,000 unused visas in FB. If any immigration business shop is so confident about their assertion, why do they not file a lawsuit on CIS. Why are they posting these messages on different forums? Do they just want to gain visibility? It seems that its better business practice is to write random statements like 'CIS failed again' without having the willingness to do something about CIS failure. Aren't there clients with pending 485 of this immigration shop. As their lawyer and with fiduciary duty towards his clients, if he is so confident of CIS failure, why is he not filing a lawsuit on CIS to guard the interest of his clients.

    Who are you questioning???

    I just conveyed the message .Nobody said it is true or false. This is the message received period. Now we need to evaluate and see if it makes sense.

    We are talking about an inefficient USCIS. It is OK to question and make sure things are happening as it should. The lawyer is not posting information everywhere. Why do you have to jump into conclusions? You and Me have a interest in us getting the green card not the lawyer. Don't expect the lawyer to file a lawsuit for you...and lets get the facts together and leave the lawyer alone.



    No comments:

    Post a Comment